Three Monks, a Chinese animated feature
film was produced by the Shanghai Animation Film Studio. It won the outstanding film award at China's Ministry of Culture, the Best
animated film prize at the first Golden Rooster Awards in
1981 and also four international awards including a Silver Bear for Short Film
at the 32nd Berlin Film Festival in
1982.
There are a lot of
management lessons that can be learnt from this film.
After watching the movie personally I could see the below listed management
lessons inherent in the movie. Read and see if you could relate the below
listed lessons from what you have seen in the movie:
Process Improvement
For a system to improve and be more efficient there needs to be constant
process improvement and in required cases process replacement. The process to
carry water was improved when there were 2 monks as compared to one. And when
there were 3 monks the entire process was replaced with the pulley system to
get the maximum efficiency.
Participative Management
When two monks are carrying a bucket between them, while marking the center the measurement is done by one and marking is done by other, this demonstrates
participative management. This is good in terms of lesser grievances, lesser confusions,
reach agreement and consensus.
Team Dynamics
Without
co-operation, it is very difficult for the team to achieve any goal.
When there was only
one monk the entire process was getting carried out without any bottlenecks. When
there were two monks, while carrying the bucket they tried to transfer the load
and responsibility to the other person, by shifting the bucket to the other end
of the stick. When there were 3 no one was ready to even work altogether.
But under crises (when
the monastery was on fire) they realized the importance of working and thereby
team work.
Interpersonal Behavior
The monks were
initially courteous to one another and even displayed humility and respect to
one another but it was immediately followed by non courteous behavior towards
each other. Management is about sustaining that courteous behavior for greater
good and to reach a win – win situation.
Effort
Adding more people to the organization should ensure that the effort to
perform the job is lessened. The efficiency kept on increasing as we moved from
1 monk to 2 to 3 monks.
Productivity
The productivity of the individuals participating should gain benefit
from the system and processes in terms of increased productivity. The productivity
kept on increasing as we moved from 1 monk to 2 to 3 monks.
SMART Goals and Division of Labor
SMART goals need to be put in place and they need to be achieved through
division of labor. The three monks at the end, defined the objectives,
dissected the entire process into small tasks and executed them. This in return
led to Excellence, maximum efficiency and maximum effectiveness.
Management Style
We can also see that all the resulting improvements in efficiency , productivity and so on and so forth , were because we mode gradually from Craftsmanship to Organised Management. When the three monks used the pulley technique we could see management as present in flat organizations being displayed. The roles are such designed that they are synergistic , interchangeable and efficient. And hence modern management is the need of the hour.This will make or break the organizations.
Management Style
We can also see that all the resulting improvements in efficiency , productivity and so on and so forth , were because we mode gradually from Craftsmanship to Organised Management. When the three monks used the pulley technique we could see management as present in flat organizations being displayed. The roles are such designed that they are synergistic , interchangeable and efficient. And hence modern management is the need of the hour.This will make or break the organizations.
Attributes
|
One Person
|
Two Person
|
Three Person
|
Work Tools
|
Stick and two bucket
(Survival :1=1) |
Stick and one bucket
(Ek se bhale do:1+1=11) |
Pulley,rope & 2 bucket
(Flat Organisation : 1+1+1=111) |
Effort
|
Maximum
|
Lesser than one person
|
Least
|
Output
|
Two Buckets
|
One bucket
|
One bucket
|
Efficiency(Per bucket)
|
Least
|
More than one person
|
Maximum
|
Bottom line : Systems should be put in place taking the organization needs into account rather than based on individuals in the organization.
Personal Experience
At work, I was working on a module independently. Then I was
assigned a co-worker who I was supposed to train and work along with him.
Gradually to make him learn more I tried to give him more and more work (not
realizing indirectly I was trying to transfer all the responsibility rather
than sharing). Although the efficiency improved due to load sharing, team
dynamics were getting disturbed because of trying to waive oneself of responsibility.
Then one more co-worker joined us and shirking off responsibility from self
intensified. One day because of the same we missed a very critical deadline and
had to face serious consequences. This bad experience made us realize our
mistake and we started moving towards organisation management. We divided the
entire work into tasks, tasks into activities and assigned the activities to
each other. Activities were created in such a way that any of us could work on
the same, but we had assigned specific activities to avoid any confusion and
shirking from responsibility. The same led to higher productivity and
efficiency. Over a period of time we received appreciation from the client for
the time and cost saved because of the excellence shown in the delivery.
And now I can relate what happened at work to what I learnt in the class ! Feel free to comment and let know what more lessons have you
learnt! Cheers!
Good write up on Three monks.. You can add... management style ( give some name )..
ReplyDeleteWhat is the name for each of the methods you want to give.. For example Method I is.. Living for Dealth.. how about method II, Method III.. and so on..
Done
Delete